The riots in the region formerly known as Arakan peaked in June.
Truthful reports on casualties and damage are as difficult to come by as
details of the fighting and how the Myanmar authorities responded.
However, available reports indicate that several hundred people died or
were maimed, the number of buildings destroyed was more than 1,000, and
the army and police behaved atrociously.
Myanmar's current problem, apart from trying to calm Rakhine state, is how to deal with international concern and anger.
The instinctive reaction of the Myanmar authorities is still to try to clam up and ignore the world's concern.
This will not do, not from a country demanding attention as a newly
emerging democracy trying to throw off the shackles of a 50-year
military dictatorship.
Everything that Myanmar has done since the riots has been wrong. Its
refusal to open the region to objective reporters and its own media
caused massive anti-government press from virtually everywhere outside
its borders. Human rights groups have "demanded" _ a favourite word _
impartial reporting.
The result was that Myanmar, almost unbelievably, cracked down on the
press again. Last week, the government banned two newspapers for
refusing to submit stories to official censors. On Saturday, Myanmar
reporters staged a public demonstration to demand an end to the
censorship system.
Worldwide, members of the free press automatically sympathised with
the Myanmar media who were brave enough to defy the system. The United
Nations' Special Rapporteur for Myanmar, Tomas Ojea Quintana, suggested
the country hold a truth commission to try to discover the causes and
effects of the riots, and come up with ways to prevent more communal
battles.
Foreign Minister Wunna Maung Lwin criticised the UN official for
daring to suggest that the army and police might have used excessive
force, specifically against the Rohingya Muslims of Rakhine.
And that extremely unthoughtful outburst caught the attention of the
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation. The OIC proposed sending a mission
to Myanmar to look into the massacres of Rohingya by the Buddhist
majority. That sort of inflammatory language is certain to result in the
OIC rejecting such a proposal, but it is a lose-lose situation for Nay
Pyi Taw. In addition to being a powerful political group, the OIC
comprises Asean partners Indonesia and Malaysia. Thailand is an OIC
observer.
Myanmar has only a couple of options of where to go next, neither of
them attractive. It can try to continue to stonewall and earn the sort
of criticism that was heaped on the country while it was run by army
juntas.
It can release information and open the Rakhine area to objective
observers, which will almost certainly result in even more criticism of
its treatment of the Rohingya, a religious minority whose members are
denied citizenship in their own country.
However, it would be a mistake for Myanmar and cause strong repercussions in Asean if the country takes the repressive road.
No comments:
Post a Comment
thank you..moderator will approve soon..your email will not be published..